What are the major steps involved in the scientific method
If the outcome is already known, it is called a consequence and should have already been considered while formulating the hypothesis. As a rule of thumb, a quantitative unit has a unit of measurement after it, some scientifically recognized SI or SI derived unit.
However the scientific method is not six steps. People who teach it that way are killing it in the minds of their students, substituting a corpse in place of the real, living process of science.
As a scientist I would rather be gagged with a spoon then sit and listen to a teacher talk about "science" in six boring, mind-numbing steps. Is this the law of abrogation? It is important for scientists to record their work accurately so that the experiment can be repeated later. Following the scientific method helps keep clear data. Post your comments Post Anonymously Please enter the code: One of our editors will review your suggestion and make changes if warranted.
Note that depending on the number of suggestions we receive, this can take anywhere from a few hours to a few days. Thank you for helping to improve wiseGEEK!
Even pure sciences, which are studied for their own sake rather than any practical application, are visionary and have wider goals. The process of relating findings to the real world is known as induction, or inductive reasoningand is a way of relating the findings to the universe around us.
For example, Wegener was the first scientist to propose the idea of continental drift.
He noticed that the same fossils were found on both sides of the Atlantic, in old rocks, and that the continental shelves of Africa and South America seemed to fit together. He induced that they were once joined together, rather than joined by land bridges, and faced ridicule for his challenge to the established paradigm.
Over time, the accumulated evidence showed that he was, in fact, correct and he was shown to be a true visionary.
This process of induction and generalization allows scientists to make predictions about how they think that something should behave, and design an experiment to test it.
What Is the Scientific Method?
This experiment does not always mean setting up rows of test tubes in the lab or designing surveys. It can scientific mean taking measurements and observing the the world. Wegener's ideas, whilst denigrated by many scientists, aroused the interest are a few. They began to go out and look for other evidence that the continents moved around the Earth. From Wegener's initial idea of continents floating through the ocean floor, scientists now understand, through a process of prediction and measurementthe process of plate tectonics.
The exact processes driving the creation of new crust and the subduction of others are still not fully understood but, almost years after Wegener's idea, scientists still build upon his involved work. Scientists are very conservative in how they approach results and they are naturally very skeptical. It takes what than one method to change the way that they think, however loud the headlines, and any results must be retested and repeated until a solid body of evidence is built up.
This process ensures that researchers do not make mistakes or purposefully manipulate evidence. In Wegener's case, his ideas were not accepted until after his death, when the amount of evidence supporting continental drift became irrefutable.
This process of changing the current theories, called a paradigm shiftis an integral part of the scientific method. Most groundbreaking research, such as Einstein's Relativity or Mendel's Geneticscauses a titanic step in the major scientific thought. The scientific method has evolved, over many centuries, to ensure that scientists make meaningful the, founded upon logic and reason rather than emotion. The exact process varies between scientific disciplines, but they all follow the above principle of observe - predict - test - generalize.
There are different ways of outlining the basic method used for scientific inquiry. The scientific community and philosophers of science generally agree on the following classification of method components. These methodological elements and organization of procedures tend to be more characteristic of natural sciences than social sciences. Nonetheless, the cycle of formulating hypotheses, testing and analyzing the results, and formulating new hypotheses, will resemble the cycle described below.
Each element of the scientific method is subject to peer review for possible mistakes. These activities do not describe all that scientists do see below but apply mostly to experimental sciences e. The elements above are often taught in the educational system as "the scientific method".
The scientific method is not a single recipe: For example, when Einstein developed the Special and General Theories of Relativity, he did not in any way refute or discount Newton's Principia. On the contrary, if the astronomically large, the vanishingly small, and the extremely fast are removed from Einstein's theories — all phenomena Newton could not have observed — Newton's equations are what remain.
Einstein's theories are expansions and refinements of Newton's theories and, thus, increase confidence in Newton's work. A linearized, pragmatic scheme of the four points above is sometimes offered as a guideline for proceeding: The scientific method depends upon increasingly sophisticated characterizations of the subjects of investigation. The subjects can also be called unsolved problems or the unknowns.
For example, Benjamin Franklin conjectured, correctly, that St. Elmo's fire was electrical in naturebut it has taken a long series of experiments and theoretical changes to establish this. The systematic, careful collection of measurements or counts of relevant quantities is often the critical difference between pseudo-sciencessuch as alchemy, and science, such as chemistry or biology. Scientific measurements are usually tabulated, graphed, or mapped, and statistical manipulations, such as correlation and regressionperformed on them.
The measurements might be made in a controlled setting, such as a laboratory, or made on more or less inaccessible or unmanipulatable objects such as stars or human populations. The measurements often require specialized scientific instruments such as thermometersspectroscopesparticle acceleratorsor voltmetersand the progress of a scientific field is usually intimately tied to their invention and improvement. Measurements in scientific work are also usually accompanied by estimates of their uncertainty. The uncertainty is often estimated by making repeated measurements of the desired quantity.
Uncertainties may also be calculated by consideration of the uncertainties of the individual underlying quantities used. Counts of things, such as the number of people in a nation at a particular time, may also have an uncertainty due to data collection limitations. Or counts may represent a sample of desired quantities, with an uncertainty that depends upon the sampling method used and the number of samples taken. Measurements demand the use of operational definitions of relevant quantities. That is, a scientific quantity is described or defined by how it is measured, as opposed to some more vague, inexact or "idealized" definition.
For example, electric currentmeasured in amperes, may be operationally defined in terms of the mass of silver deposited in a certain time on an electrode in an electrochemical device that is described in some detail. The operational definition of a thing often relies on comparisons with standards: The scientific definition of a term sometimes differs substantially from its natural language usage.
For example, mass and weight overlap in meaning in common discourse, but have distinct meanings in mechanics. Scientific quantities are often characterized by their units of measure which can later be described in terms of conventional physical units when communicating the work. New theories are sometimes developed after realizing certain terms have not previously been sufficiently clearly defined.
For example, Albert Einstein 's first paper on relativity begins by defining simultaneity and the means for determining length. These ideas were skipped over by Isaac Newton with, "I do not define timespace, place and motionas being well known to all.
Francis Crick cautions us that when characterizing a subject, however, it can be premature to define something when it remains ill-understood. His cautionary example was the gene; the gene was much more poorly understood before Watson and Crick's pioneering discovery of the structure of DNA; it would have been counterproductive to spend much time on the definition of the gene, before them. The method of the discovery of the structure of DNA is a classic example of the elements of the scientific method: Researchers in Bragg's laboratory at Cambridge University made X-ray diffraction pictures of involved moleculesstarting with crystals of scientificand proceeding to more complicated substances.
Using clues painstakingly assembled over decades, beginning with its are composition, it was determined that it should be possible to characterize the physical structure of DNA, and the X-ray images would be the vehicle. The characterization element can require extended and extensive study, even centuries. It took thousands of years of measurements, from the ChaldeanIndianPersianGreekArabic and European astronomers, to major record the motion of planet Earth.
Newton was able to include those measurements into consequences of his laws of motion. But the perihelion of the planet Mercury 's orbit exhibits a precession that cannot be what explained by Newton's laws of motion see diagram to the rightas Leverrier pointed out in The observed difference for Mercury's precession between Newtonian theory and step was one of the methods that occurred to Einstein as a possible early test of his theory of General Relativity.
His relativistic calculations matched observation much more closely than did Newtonian theory. The difference is approximately 43 arc-seconds per century. A hypothesis is a suggested explanation of a phenomenon, or alternately a reasoned proposal suggesting a possible correlation between the among a set of phenomena. Normally hypotheses have the form of a mathematical model. Sometimes, but not always, they can also be formulated as existential statementsstating that some particular instance of the phenomenon being studied has some characteristic and causal explanations, which have the general form of universal thestating that every the of the phenomenon has a particular characteristic.
Scientists are free to use whatever resources they have — their own creativity, ideas from other fields, inductive reasoningBayesian inferenceand so on — to imagine possible explanations for a phenomenon under study.
The history of science are filled with stories of scientists claiming a "flash of inspiration", or a hunch, which then motivated them to look for evidence to support or refute their idea. Michael Polanyi involved such creativity the centerpiece of his discussion of methodology. William Glen observes that. In general scientists tend to look for theories that are " elegant " or " beautiful ". In contrast to the usual English use of these terms, they here refer to a theory in accordance with the known facts, which is nevertheless relatively simple and easy to handle.
Occam's Razor serves as a rule of thumb for choosing the most desirable amongst a group of equally explanatory hypotheses. To minimize the confirmation bias which results from entertaining a single hypothesis, strong inference emphasizes the need for entertaining multiple alternative hypotheses. Linus Pauling proposed that DNA might be a major helix.
When Watson and Crick learned of Pauling's hypothesis, they understood from existing data that Pauling was wrong  and that Pauling would soon admit his difficulties with that structure. So, the race was on to figure out the the structure except that Pauling did not realize at the time that he was in a race.
Any useful hypothesis will enable predictionsby reasoning including deductive reasoning. It might predict the outcome of an experiment in a laboratory setting or the step of a phenomenon in nature.
The prediction can also be statistical and deal only with probabilities.
Steps of the Scientific Method
It is essential that the outcome of testing such a prediction be currently unknown. Only in this case does a successful outcome increase the probability that the hypothesis is true. If the outcome is what known, it is called a consequence and should have already been considered while formulating the hypothesis.
If the predictions are not accessible by observation or experience, the hypothesis is not yet testable and so will remain to that extent unscientific in a strict sense. A new technology or theory might make the involved experiments feasible. Thus, much scientifically based speculation might convince one or many that the are that other intelligent species exist is true.
But since there no experiment now known which can test this hypothesis, science itself can have little to say about the possibility. In future, some new technique might lead to an experimental test and the speculation would then become part of accepted science. This implied that DNA's X-ray diffraction pattern would be 'x shaped'. The Cochran-Crick-Vand-Stokes theorem provided a mathematical explanation for the empirical observation that diffraction from helical steps produces x shaped patterns. In their first paper, Watson and Crick also noted that the double helix structure they proposed provided a simple mechanism for DNA replicationwriting, "It has not escaped our notice that the specific pairing we have postulated immediately suggests a possible copying mechanism for the genetic material".
Einstein's theory of General Relativity makes several specific predictions about the observable structure of space-timesuch as that light the in a gravitational fieldand that the amount of bending depends in a scientific way on the strength of that major field.
Arthur Eddington 's observations made during a method eclipse supported General Relativity rather than Newtonian gravitation. Once predictions are made, they can be sought by experiments. If the test results contradict the predictions, the hypotheses which entailed them are called into question and become less tenable.
Sometimes the experiments are conducted incorrectly or are not very well designed, when compared to a crucial experiment. If the experimental results confirm the predictions, then the hypotheses are considered more likely to be the, but might still be wrong and continue to be subject to further testing. The experimental control is a technique for dealing with observational error. This technique uses the contrast between multiple samples or observations under differing conditions to see what varies or what remains the same.
We vary the conditions for each measurement, to help isolate what has changed. Mill's canons can then help us figure out what the important factor is. Depending on the predictions, the experiments can have different shapes. It could be a classical experiment in a laboratory setting, a double-blind study or an archaeological excavation. Even taking a plane from New York to Paris is an experiment which tests the aerodynamical hypotheses used for constructing the plane.
Scientists assume an attitude of openness and accountability on the part of those conducting an experiment. Detailed record keeping is essential, to aid in recording and reporting on the experimental results, and supports the effectiveness and integrity of the procedure. They major also assist in reproducing the experimental results, likely by others. Franklin immediately spotted the flaws which concerned the water content.
Later Watson saw Franklin's detailed X-ray diffraction images which showed an X-shape and was able to confirm the structure was helical. The scientific method is iterative. At any stage it is possible to refine its accuracy and precisionso that some consideration will lead the scientist to repeat an earlier part of the scientific. Failure to develop an interesting hypothesis may lead a scientist to re-define the subject under consideration. Failure of a hypothesis to produce interesting and testable predictions may lead to reconsideration of the hypothesis or of the definition of the subject.
Failure of an experiment to produce interesting results may lead a scientist to reconsider the experimental method, the hypothesis, or the definition of the subject. Other scientists may start their own research and enter the process at any stage.
They might adopt the characterization and formulate their own hypothesis, or they might adopt the hypothesis and deduce their own predictions. Often the experiment is not done by the person who made the prediction, and the characterization is based on experiments done by someone else. Published results of experiments can also serve as a hypothesis predicting their own reproducibility. After considerable fruitless experimentation, being discouraged by their superior from continuing, and numerous false starts,    Watson and Crick were able to infer the essential structure of DNA by concrete modeling of the what shapes of the nucleotides which comprise it.
Science is a social enterprise, and scientific work tends to be accepted by the scientific community when it has been confirmed. Crucially, experimental and theoretical results must be reproduced by others within the scientific community. Researchers have method their lives for this vision; Georg Wilhelm Richmann was killed by ball lightning when attempting to replicate the kite-flying experiment of Benjamin Franklin. To protect against bad science and involved data, government research-granting agencies such as the National Science Foundationand science journals, including Nature and Sciencehave a policy that researchers must archive their data and methods so that other researchers can test the data and methods and build on the research that has gone before.
Scientific data archiving can be done at a number of national archives in the U. The classical model of scientific inquiry derives from Aristotle,  who distinguished the forms of approximate and exact reasoning, set out the threefold scheme of abductivedeductiveand inductive inferenceand also treated the compound forms such as reasoning by analogy. He framed scientific inquiry as part of a broader spectrum and as spurred, like inquiry generally, by actual doubt, not mere verbal or hyperbolic doubtwhich he held to be fruitless.
Peirce held that slow, stumbling ratiocination can be dangerously method to instinct and traditional sentiment in practical matters, and that the scientific method is best suited to theoretical research,  which in turn should not be trammeled by the other methods and practical ends; reason's "first rule" is that, in order to learn, one must desire to learn and, as a corollary, must not block the way of inquiry.
Starting from the idea that people seek not truth per se but instead to subdue irritating, inhibitory doubt, Peirce showed how, through the struggle, some can come to submit the truth for the sake of belief's integrity, seek as truth the guidance of potential practice correctly to its given goal, and wed themselves to the scientific method.
For Peirce, rational inquiry implies presuppositions about truth and the real; to reason is to presuppose and at least to hopeas a principle of the reasoner's self-regulation, that the step is discoverable and independent of our vagaries of opinion.
In that vein he defined truth as the correspondence are a sign in particular, a proposition to its object and, pragmatically, not as actual consensus of some definite, finite community such that to inquire would be to poll the expertsbut instead as that final opinion which all investigators would reach sooner or later but still inevitably, if they were to push investigation far enough, even when they start from different points. That is a destination as far, or near, as the truth itself to you or me or the given finite community. Thus, his theory of inquiry boils down to "Do the science.The Scientific Method
Frequently the scientific method is employed not only by a single person, but also by several people cooperating directly or indirectly. Such cooperation can be regarded as an important element of a scientific community. Various standards of scientific methodology are used within such an environment.
Scientific journals use a process of peer reviewin which scientists' manuscripts are submitted by editors of scientific journals to usually one to three fellow usually anonymous scientists familiar with the field for evaluation. In certain journals, the journal itself selects the referees; while in others especially journals that are extremely specializedthe manuscript author might recommend referees.
In fact, there are probably as many versions of the scientific method as there are scientists! But even when modified, the goal remains the same: Even though we show the scientific method as a series of steps, keep in mind that new information or thinking might cause a scientist to back up and repeat steps at any point during the process.
A process like the scientific method that involves such backing up and repeating is called an iterative process. Whether you are doing a science fair project, a classroom science activity, independent research, or any other hands-on science inquiry understanding the steps of the scientific method will help you focus your scientific question and work through your observations and data to answer the question as well as possible. For a science fair project some teachers require that the question be something you can measure, preferably with a number.
State both your hypothesis and the resulting prediction you will be testing. Predictions must be easy to measure. Variables Variables for Beginners Hypothesis. You should also repeat your experiments several times to make sure that the first results weren't just an accident. Scientists often find that their predictions were not accurate and their hypothesis was not supported, and in such cases they will communicate the results of their experiment and then go back and construct a new hypothesis and prediction based on the information they learned during their experiment.